Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#445 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
5.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-49% greener
A
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
402 YM TARGET
IMO 9860934
12,690 TEU 2021
5.0
A
404 CMA CGM ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY
IMO 9776418
20,600 TEU 2018
5.0
A
401 MSC AMBRA
IMO 9839480
22,000 TEU 2020
5.0
A
409 NORFOLK EXPRESS
IMO 9665592
13,800 TEU 2013
5.0
A
408 AL MURAYKH
IMO 9708863
18,800 TEU 2015
5.0
A
405 COSCO SHIPPING GALAXY
IMO 9795634
21,000 TEU 2019
5.0
A
403 CMA CGM PELLEAS
IMO 9365788
9,661 TEU 2008
5.0
A
407 COSCO SHIPPING HIMALAYAS
IMO 9757840
13,636 TEU 2017
5.0
A
406 COSCO SHIPPING NEBULA
IMO 9795622
21,000 TEU 2018
5.0
A
412 MAERSK SAN CLEMENTE
IMO 9699189
9,000 TEU 2014
5.0
A
411 MAERSK CLEVELAND
IMO 9936408
15,500 TEU 2023
5.0
A
410 ONE FREEDOM
IMO 9934357
15,000 TEU 2022
5.0
A
413 MSC FEBE
IMO 9839478
22,000 TEU 2019
5.0
A
414 APL RAFFLES
IMO 9631979
13,892 TEU 2013
5.0
A
415 COSCO SHIPPING KILIMANJARO
IMO 9757852
13,636 TEU 2017
5.0
A
419 MSC OSCAR
IMO 9703291
18,400 TEU 2014
5.0
A
418 UMM QARN
IMO 9732333
15,000 TEU 2016
5.0
A
417 MSC PALOMA
IMO 9441001
13,200 TEU 2010
5.0
A
416 HMM FOREST
IMO 9998470
100,902 2025
5.0
A
420 EVER AEON
IMO 9943279
24,004 TEU 2024
5.0
A
422 CHARLESTON EXPRESS
IMO 9665645
13,800 TEU 2014
5.0
A
421 MUNKEBO MAERSK
IMO 9632117
18,270 TEU 2014
5.0
A
425 YM WIDTH
IMO 9708447
14,198 TEU 2016
5.0
A
424 YM WELLHEAD
IMO 9684665
14,080 TEU 2015
5.0
A
423 APL CHANGI
IMO 9631981
13,892 TEU 2013
5.0
A
427 ATLANTA EXPRESS
IMO 9667162
13,800 TEU 2014
5.0
A
426 AL MASHRAB
IMO 9732319
15,000 TEU 2016
5.0
A
429 MSC ORION
IMO 9857157
15,000 TEU 2020
5.0
A
428 MSC DIANA
IMO 9755933
17,590 TEU 2016
5.0
A
430 MSC MARA
IMO 9932892
15,600 TEU 2023
5.0
A
433 SAN AUGUSTIN MAERSK
IMO 9622239
9,669 TEU 2013
5.0
A
435 COSCO SHIPPING STAR
IMO 9795658
21,000 TEU 2019
5.0
A
432 HMM PRIDE
IMO 9637260
13,154 TEU 2014
5.0
A
431 HYUNDAI JUPITER
IMO 9725134
10,055 TEU 2016
5.0
A
434 YM TROPHY
IMO 9789996
14,000 TEU 2022
5.0
A
437 MSC MINA
IMO 9839260
22,000 TEU 2019
5.1
A
436 EVER MASS
IMO 9935234
15,000 TEU 2024
5.1
A
443 CMA CGM ADONIS
IMO 9882528
15,000 TEU 2022
5.1
A
442 HOUSTON EXPRESS
IMO 9667150
13,800 TEU 2014
5.1
A
444 MSC LUCIANA
IMO 9398383
11,700 TEU 2009
5.1
A
441 CMA CGM EVERGLADE
IMO 9894985
15,000 TEU 2022
5.1
A
440 EVER GOLDEN
IMO 9811012
20,000 TEU 2018
5.1
A
439 BARZAN
IMO 9708851
18,691 TEU 2015
5.1
A
438 CMA CGM BRAZIL
IMO 9860245
15,128 TEU 2020
5.1
A
446 OOCL INDONESIA
IMO 9776224
21,100 TEU 2018
5.1
B
445 MSC TOGO
IMO 9974486
8,300 TEU 2025
5.1
B
447 MSC KAYLEY
IMO 9927299
15,264 TEU 2023
5.1
B
450 MSC MIRJA
IMO 9762338
15,909 TEU 2016
5.1
B
449 COSCO SHIPPING ROSE
IMO 9785809
13,500 TEU 2018
5.1
B
448 MAERSK CINCINNATI
IMO 9936410
15,500 TEU 2024
5.1
B
Page 9 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.