Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#519 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
5.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-46% greener
B
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
501 CMA CGM BUTTERFLY
IMO 9365790
9,661 TEU 2008
5.2
B
504 MSC REEF
IMO 9754965
17,664 TEU 2016
5.2
B
506 MSC AMSTERDAM
IMO 9606338
16,652 TEU 2015
5.2
B
503 MSC ELAINE
IMO 9393321
8,562 TEU 2009
5.2
B
502 TIHAMA
IMO 9736107
18,800 TEU 2016
5.2
B
505 EVER MUSE
IMO 9935349
15,000 TEU 2024
5.2
B
510 MSC MAYA
IMO 9708679
18,400 TEU 2015
5.2
B
509 MSC JEWEL
IMO 9842073
15,000 TEU 2019
5.2
B
508 MAYA BAY
IMO 9983401
2,954 TEU 2023
5.2
B
507 HMM SKY
IMO 9976599
85,516 2024
5.2
B
512 ALS CERES
IMO 9938303
7,165 TEU 2021
5.3
B
511 EVER GENIUS
IMO 9786815
20,000 TEU 2018
5.3
B
513 CSCL PACIFIC OCEAN
IMO 9695133
19,000 TEU 2014
5.3
B
514 COSCO SHIPPING ALPS
IMO 9757864
13,636 TEU 2018
5.3
B
515 EVER MEED
IMO 9935258
15,000 TEU 2024
5.3
B
516 MSC SOLA
IMO 9401104
11,300 TEU 2008
5.3
B
517 EBBA MAERSK
IMO 9321524
11,000 TEU 2007
5.3
B
518 AL NEFUD
IMO 9708813
18,691 TEU 2015
5.3
B
521 GREENFIELD
IMO 9970026
7,200 TEU 2024
5.3
B
520 CMA CGM ENDURANCE
IMO 9951549
7,600 TEU 2024
5.3
B
519 MSC ARIANE
IMO 9484443
13,050 TEU 2012
5.3
B
522 EVER GIVEN
IMO 9811000
20,000 TEU 2015
5.3
B
524 HMM DRIVE
IMO 9637246
13,154 TEU 2014
5.3
B
523 EVER GLOBE
IMO 9786841
20,000 TEU 2019
5.3
B
525 MSC VENICE
IMO 9647473
16,552 TEU 2016
5.3
B
526 KIEL EXPRESS
IMO 9229855
7,179 TEU 2003
5.4
B
528 EVER GENTLE
IMO 9820922
20,150 TEU 2019
5.4
B
527 MSC FAITH
IMO 9842085
15,000 TEU 2019
5.4
B
529 YM WREATH
IMO 9708473
14,198 TEU 2017
5.4
B
531 EXPRESS BRAZIL
IMO 9443023
3,459 TEU 2010
5.4
B
530 APL TEMASEK
IMO 9631955
13,892 TEU 2013
5.4
B
532 COSCO JAPAN
IMO 9448748
8,500 TEU 2010
5.4
B
533 MSC GENOVA
IMO 9461386
14,000 TEU 2010
5.4
B
534 MSC DEILA
IMO 9461415
14,000 TEU 2012
5.4
B
535 TAMPA TRIUMPH
IMO 9737462
13,870 TEU 2017
5.4
B
536 MAERSK SHIVLING
IMO 9728253
9,162 TEU 2016
5.4
B
540 COSCO INDONESIA
IMO 9448786
8,500 TEU 2010
5.4
B
539 EVER LAWFUL
IMO 9595498
8,000 TEU 2012
5.4
B
538 EVER ALOT
IMO 9893955
23,888 TEU 2022
5.4
B
537 MSC GAIA
IMO 9401142
10,000 TEU 2010
5.4
B
542 NINGBO EXPRESS
IMO 9229843
7,179 TEU 2002
5.4
B
543 AL RIFFA
IMO 9525912
13,296 TEU 2012
5.4
B
541 ELLY MAERSK
IMO 9321536
11,000 TEU 2007
5.4
B
544 MAERSK CHAMBAL
IMO 9525376
4,500 TEU 2012
5.5
B
546 CMA CGM TIGA
IMO 9938418
5,500 TEU 2025
5.5
B
545 MSC DANIELA
IMO 9399002
10,000 TEU 2008
5.5
B
547 MSC KATIE
IMO 9467457
12,400 TEU 2012
5.5
B
549 CAP SAN ARTEMISSIO
IMO 9633939
9,600 TEU 2014
5.5
B
548 MSC BIANCA
IMO 9770749
11,500 TEU 2019
5.5
B
550 CAP SAN SOUNIO
IMO 9633953
9,600 TEU 2014
5.5
B
Page 11 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.