Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#211 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
2.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-49% greener
A

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
204 STARWAY
IMO 9900801
157,552 2019
2.6
A
203 NORDIC HUNTER
IMO 9921075
157,037 2020
2.6
A
202 AEGEAN DREAM
IMO 9645425
158,888 2015
2.6
A
201 ZENITH SPIRIT
IMO 9404845
159,952 2009
2.6
A
205 YASA POLARIS
IMO 9907457
158,224 2022
2.6
A
207 ENERGY TRIUMPH
IMO 9817614
157,470 2018
2.6
A
206 FRONT SUEZ
IMO 9831830
157,270 2017
2.6
A
210 PACIFIC
IMO 9912141
158,406 2015
2.6
A
209 MONTE URBASA
IMO 9785835
156,400 2018
2.6
A
208 DR IRENE TSAKOS
IMO 9993755
156,838 2025
2.6
A
211 NEW COMFORT
IMO 9706413
313,727 2016
2.6
A
214 FRONT CLIPPER
IMO 9759771
157,351 2017
2.6
A
213 TAIPAN
IMO 9996393
159,076 2024
2.6
A
212 NISSOS KOUFONISSI
IMO 9895214
157,447 2021
2.6
A
215 FOLEGANDROS
IMO 9793753
159,221 2018
2.6
A
219 OCEANIS
IMO 9532757
320,780 2011
2.7
A
218 NISSOS TINOS
IMO 9886782
157,447 2021
2.7
A
217 FRONT CORAL
IMO 9743203
157,522 2017
2.7
A
216 ALDANA
IMO 9809368
156,670 2016
2.7
A
220 NORDIC AQUARIUS
IMO 9818216
157,338 2018
2.7
A
221 MARAN HERCULES
IMO 9761360
157,756 2014
2.7
A
223 MONTE ULIA
IMO 9803285
156,424 2019
2.7
A
222 GREENWAY
IMO 9900796
157,327 2019
2.7
A
225 SFL SABINE
IMO 9799874
115,711 2015
2.7
A
224 POPI P
IMO 9934319
157,010 2021
2.7
A
227 FEARLESS WARRIOR
IMO 1028736
156,885 2025
2.7
A
226 BOUBOULINA
IMO 9298753
163,759 2006
2.7
A
228 TAQAH
IMO 9501174
316,373 2008
2.7
A
230 SONANGOL CAZENGA
IMO 9766310
156,899 2017
2.7
A
229 DELTA MARINER
IMO 9579573
157,638 2013
2.7
A
232 MARLIN SHIKOKU
IMO 9841627
156,574 2017
2.7
A
231 FRATERNITY
IMO 9416733
157,714 2009
2.7
A
233 FRONT CRYSTAL
IMO 9743186
157,409 2017
2.7
A
234 SPEEDWAY
IMO 9749506
158,594 2014
2.7
A
235 EAGLE SAN ANTONIO
IMO 9594822
157,849 2012
2.7
A
240 FRONT CHALLENGER
IMO 9759745
157,407 2016
2.7
A
236 MARAN PHOEBE
IMO 9868156
157,946 2020
2.7
A
239 MARAN HOMER
IMO 9761372
156,458 2017
2.7
A
238 SEA AMBER
IMO 9772931
158,455 2016
2.7
A
237 ARIADNE
IMO 9973834
114,905 2024
2.7
A
241 SFL FRASER
IMO 9874258
158,060 2018
2.7
A
244 STENA SUEDE
IMO 9579042
158,824 2011
2.7
A
243 EVA MAERSK
IMO 9682992
158,468 2017
2.7
A
242 SEA SHELL
IMO 9773947
158,409 2015
2.7
A
247 MARLIN SANTORINI
IMO 9835836
156,587 2017
2.7
A
246 DILONG SPIRIT
IMO 9390628
159,021 2009
2.7
A
245 KANARIS 21
IMO 9889942
156,921 2019
2.7
A
250 MINERVA KALLISTO
IMO 9853008
113,000 2016
2.8
A
249 MARAN HELIOS
IMO 9761358
156,458 2017
2.8
A
248 OTTOMAN COURTESY
IMO 9788708
152,544 2017
2.8
A
Page 5 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.