Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,644 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
13.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
+31% higher
D
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1601 AS CLAUDIA
IMO 9330549
2,824 TEU 2007
13.1
D
1602 PANDA 003
IMO 9968891
1,400 TEU 2024
13.1
D
1603 FLEUR N
IMO 9509138
2,758 TEU 2012
13.2
D
1604 MSC BREMERHAVEN V
IMO 9313967
4,196 TEU 2007
13.2
D
1605 MSC AUBE F
IMO 9360283
1,060 TEU 2005
13.2
D
1606 JEAN PIERRE A
IMO 9379351
1,604 TEU 2007
13.2
D
1607 RAQUEL S
IMO 9515591
1,577 TEU 2009
13.2
D
1608 MSC TIANA F
IMO 9108398
1,129 TEU 1996
13.2
D
1609 IRENES REMEDY
IMO 9315850
2,826 TEU 2005
13.2
D
1610 HARIS
IMO 9670119
2,190 TEU 2015
13.2
D
1611 CAUCEDO EXPRESS
IMO 9434931
2,550 TEU 2009
13.2
D
1612 EF EMMA
IMO 9357808
1,706 TEU 2008
13.2
D
1613 MSC REET II
IMO 9236224
1,400 TEU 2002
13.2
D
1614 AS PENELOPE
IMO 9294537
2,572 TEU 2005
13.2
D
1615 TANJA
IMO 9431692
4,250 TEU 2009
13.2
D
1616 EMPIRE
IMO 9387425
1,400 TEU 2009
13.3
D
1617 CMA CGM FORT SAINT CHARLES
IMO 9809849
3,300 TEU 2019
13.3
D
1618 MARSA PRIDE
IMO 9301445
2,556 TEU 2005
13.3
D
1619 ELBINSEL
IMO 9977426
20,150 2024
13.3
D
1620 SONGA PUMA
IMO 9399789
2,750 TEU 2009
13.3
D
1621 KAAN KALKAVAN
IMO 9365879
1,849 TEU 2012
13.3
D
1622 CMA CGM AQABA
IMO 9334820
1,740 TEU 2007
13.3
D
1623 CMA CGM MAPUTO
IMO 9491628
1,740 TEU 2011
13.4
D
1624 MED CESME
IMO 9256365
1,740 TEU 2003
13.4
D
1625 MUSTAFA DAYI
IMO 9365855
1,849 TEU 2011
13.4
D
1626 CMA CGM FUZHOU
IMO 9596313
1,740 TEU 2014
13.4
D
1627 MSC BELLE
IMO 9203904
1,098 TEU 1998
13.4
D
1628 VEGA COLIGNY
IMO 9939876
1,868 TEU 2023
13.4
D
1629 MSC ALBA F
IMO 9499010
1,022 TEU 2008
13.4
D
1630 MARLA BULL
IMO 9932945
1,900 TEU 2022
13.4
D
1631 BG BLUE
IMO 9964625
1,400 TEU 2024
13.4
D
1632 LUEBECK
IMO 9216092
1,040 TEU 2001
13.4
D
1633 CAPE FRANKLIN
IMO 9359301
1,440 TEU 2006
13.5
D
1634 RAMHAN
IMO 9668960
3,100 TEU 2015
13.5
D
1635 GRANDE COTONOU
IMO 9672105
1,800 TEU 2015
13.5
D
1636 ANNABA
IMO 9306201
1,574 TEU 2006
13.5
D
1637 LION
IMO 9208356
1,716 TEU 2000
13.5
D
1638 CAPE FERROL
IMO 9359325
1,440 TEU 2008
13.5
D
1639 CMA CGM SAHARA
IMO 9220861
2,226 TEU 2002
13.6
D
1640 CMA CGM FORT ROYAL
IMO 9809837
3,300 TEU 2019
13.6
D
1641 KESTREL
IMO 9626558
1,805 TEU 2013
13.6
D
1642 AVA D
IMO 9306225
1,574 TEU 2007
13.6
D
1643 GRANDE TEMA
IMO 9672090
1,800 TEU 2014
13.6
D
1644 BFAD PACIFIC
IMO 9364203
2,490 TEU 2005
13.6
D
1645 ESPERANCE
IMO 9491484
1,349 TEU 2011
13.6
D
1646 ELBBRIDGE
IMO 9968920
1,400 TEU 2021
13.7
D
1647 JOANNA
IMO 9204477
1,730 TEU 1999
13.7
D
1648 SPRING C
IMO 9308027
3,500 TEU 2007
13.7
D
1649 MSC JIANI
IMO 9966934
1,800 TEU 2023
13.7
D
1650 CMA CGM ABIDJAN
IMO 9323481
1,740 TEU 2006
13.7
D
Page 33 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.