Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#226 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
2.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-40% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
202 OMAHA
IMO 9363041
177,805 2008
2.8
A
201 VILLARS
IMO 9618812
179,905 2011
2.8
A
203 CAPE DIVERSITY
IMO 9936745
182,236 2023
2.8
A
204 CSSC IMMINGHAM
IMO 9853929
120,613 2021
2.8
A
208 ROBUSTO
IMO 9386512
175,000 2003
2.8
A
205 JAG ANAND
IMO 9463308
179,018 2011
2.8
A
207 CAPE AMANDA
IMO 9552410
182,741 2011
2.8
A
206 BASIC EXPLORER
IMO 9944338
82,609 2023
2.8
A
209 STAR VIRGINIA
IMO 9698874
81,061 2015
2.8
A
212 NEW YORK
IMO 9405332
177,773 2010
2.8
A
211 DENSA SHARK
IMO 9607681
179,227 2012
2.8
A
210 NAVIOS GEM
IMO 9682942
181,193 2014
2.8
A
213 XIN MAY
IMO 9837315
180,682 2017
2.8
A
215 YAESU
IMO 9945100
82,629 2023
2.8
A
214 IANTHE
IMO 9438779
180,018 2009
2.8
A
220 EFROSSINI
IMO 1050727
82,111 2023
2.8
A
219 ICONSHIP
IMO 9641895
181,392 2013
2.8
A
218 NAVIOS PHOENIX
IMO 9552276
180,242 2009
2.8
A
217 NAOMI
IMO 9750971
181,031 2016
2.8
A
216 NORD ASTRALIS
IMO 9738222
85,015 2017
2.8
A
221 BH PROGRESS
IMO 1025796
82,224 2025
2.8
A
223 BRILLIANT KNIGHT
IMO 9878149
82,009 2020
2.8
A
222 GCL PRAIA MOLE
IMO 9974008
82,729 2024
2.8
A
224 MICHALIS H
IMO 9637791
180,355 2012
2.8
A
225 NAVIOS ALTAMIRA
IMO 9589827
179,164 2006
2.8
A
227 BUNGO QUEEN
IMO 9977816
82,729 2025
2.8
A
226 SEATTLE SLEW
IMO 9573737
181,447 2010
2.8
A
229 LOWLANDS IYO
IMO 9987249
82,019 2024
2.8
A
228 ENNA
IMO 9453743
175,975 2006
2.8
A
230 DUCHESS LILY
IMO 9996977
82,720 2024
2.9
A
231 LOWLANDS KAMI
IMO 9968346
82,459 2024
2.9
A
233 BERGE SONG SHAN
IMO 9436513
180,154 2010
2.9
A
232 ROYAL LAUREL
IMO 9873163
81,962 2019
2.9
A
234 CIARA MARU
IMO 9932098
82,626 2022
2.9
A
241 CSSC ROTTERDAM
IMO 9853905
120,640 2021
2.9
A
240 NAVIOS STELLAR
IMO 9498781
169,001 2006
2.9
A
239 CS CHENGDU
IMO 9928231
84,953 2022
2.9
A
238 KATY OLDENDORFF
IMO 1021740
82,119 2025
2.9
A
237 KEEPER
IMO 9313395
174,674 2005
2.9
A
236 LOWLANDS CONCORD
IMO 9959412
82,778 2024
2.9
A
235 LOWLANDS INFINITY
IMO 9965784
82,239 2024
2.9
A
249 GCL GOMTI
IMO 9939943
120,317 2021
2.9
A
248 ETG MISHIMA
IMO 9907847
81,957 2019
2.9
A
245 TOKUGAWA
IMO 9937220
82,570 2023
2.9
A
247 JUBILANT DREAM
IMO 9767508
181,265 2016
2.9
A
246 MAPLE WELL
IMO 9993834
82,253 2025
2.9
A
244 SHANDONG DE FENG
IMO 9872119
180,657 2021
2.9
A
243 STAR VOYAGER
IMO 9968334
82,459 2024
2.9
A
242 ATLANTIC SAMURAI
IMO 9783980
81,725 2019
2.9
A
250 NICOLAUS SCHULTE
IMO 9966312
82,004 2023
2.9
A
Page 5 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.