Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar
Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.
CII band distribution
1,081 at D/E2,510 rated vessels · 461 of the D/E set dock within 12 months
Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter
Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.
Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment
| Measure | Eligible | CO₂ reduction | Capex band | Payback | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbocharger cut-out | 1,477 | 1–3% | €80k–250k | — | vendor claim |
| Propeller redesign / replacement | 1,440 | 5–10% | €400k–1,200k | — | vendor claim |
| Bulbous bow reprofiling | 1,344 | 2–6% | €300k–900k | — | vendor claim |
| Methanol dual-fuel conversion | 965 | 5–15% | €8,000k–20,000k | — | vendor claim |
| LNG dual-fuel conversion | 795 | 15–25% | €15,000k–35,000k | — | vendor claim |
| Shaft generator / PTO | 360 | 3–6% | €500–1,500/kW | — | vendor claim |
Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.
Retrofit opportunity in this segment
Retrofit prospects — worst band first
| Vessel | Band | Age | Drop year |
|---|---|---|---|
| HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k | E | 16y | 2026 |
| SEPELU · <25k | E | 26y | 2026 |
| MSC SABRINA III · <25k | E | 37y | 2026 |
| NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k | E | 18y | 2026 |
| HAMBURG TRADER · <25k | E | 21y | 2026 |
Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.
| # | Vessel | Size (TEU) | Built | Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 |
MATHILDE MAERSK
IMO 9632179
|
18,340 TEU | 2015 |
4.0
|
A |
| 102 |
EVER ECO
IMO 1025203
|
16,500 TEU | 2023 |
4.0
|
A |
| 103 |
ANGELICA MAERSK
IMO 9948798
|
16,592 TEU | 2021 |
4.0
|
A |
| 104 |
MSC ANNAMARIA
IMO 9987304
|
16,000 TEU | 2025 |
4.0
|
A |
| 105 |
MSC SAN FRANCISCO
IMO 9987328
|
16,000 TEU | 2025 |
4.0
|
A |
| 107 |
CMA CGM IGUACU
IMO 9859131
|
15,128 TEU | 2021 |
4.0
|
A |
| 106 |
BUSAN EXPRESS
IMO 9540144
|
23,660 TEU | 2024 |
4.0
|
A |
| 108 |
DAMIETTA EXPRESS
IMO 9543108
|
23,660 TEU | 2024 |
4.0
|
A |
| 109 |
MONACO MAERSK
IMO 9778832
|
20,568 TEU | 2017 |
4.1
|
A |
| 110 |
CMA CGM ARGENTINA
IMO 9839909
|
15,128 TEU | 2019 |
4.1
|
A |
| 113 |
ARTHUR MAERSK
IMO 9961829
|
16,592 TEU | 2025 |
4.1
|
A |
| 116 |
CMA CGM SORBONNE
IMO 9839210
|
22,448 TEU | 2021 |
4.1
|
A |
| 112 |
CMA CGM BALI
IMO 9867827
|
15,128 TEU | 2021 |
4.1
|
A |
| 115 |
MAASTRICHT MAERSK
IMO 9780483
|
20,568 TEU | 2015 |
4.1
|
A |
| 111 |
MSC CHINA
IMO 9936642
|
272,131 | 2023 |
4.1
|
A |
| 114 |
WILHELMSHAVEN EXPRESS
IMO 9943918
|
23,660 TEU | 2025 |
4.1
|
A |
| 117 |
CMA CGM PLATINUM
IMO 9996707
|
147,196 | 2025 |
4.1
|
A |
| 120 |
MSC C. MONTAINE
IMO 9930961
|
15,500 TEU | 2023 |
4.1
|
A |
| 119 |
MSC ANITA
IMO 9947146
|
16,000 TEU | 2024 |
4.1
|
A |
| 118 |
CMA CGM HOPE
IMO 9897755
|
15,128 TEU | 2021 |
4.1
|
A |
| 122 |
YM WORLD
IMO 9684653
|
14,080 TEU | 2015 |
4.1
|
A |
| 121 |
OOCL GDYNIA
IMO 9908102
|
24,188 TEU | 2023 |
4.1
|
A |
| 123 |
HAMBURG EXPRESS
IMO 9943865
|
23,660 TEU | 2024 |
4.1
|
A |
| 125 |
MANILA MAERSK
IMO 9780469
|
20,568 TEU | 2018 |
4.1
|
A |
| 124 |
GENOVA EXPRESS
IMO 9943906
|
23,660 TEU | 2025 |
4.1
|
A |
| 127 |
YM WISH
IMO 9684641
|
15,000 TEU | 2015 |
4.1
|
A |
| 128 |
CMA CGM UNITY
IMO 9897767
|
15,128 TEU | 2021 |
4.1
|
A |
| 126 |
MSC IERANTO
IMO 9963619
|
15,600 TEU | 2025 |
4.1
|
A |
| 132 |
OOCL PORTUGAL
IMO 9922615
|
24,000 TEU | 2024 |
4.1
|
A |
| 131 |
GDANSK EXPRESS
IMO 9943877
|
23,660 TEU | 2024 |
4.1
|
A |
| 133 |
ANE MAERSK
IMO 9948748
|
16,592 TEU | 2021 |
4.1
|
A |
| 130 |
MSC DARLENE
IMO 9930959
|
15,500 TEU | 2023 |
4.1
|
A |
| 129 |
MSC TURKIYE
IMO 9931288
|
24,000 TEU | 2023 |
4.1
|
A |
| 134 |
CMA CGM CONCORDE
IMO 9839208
|
22,448 TEU | 2021 |
4.1
|
A |
| 136 |
MSC LEILA
IMO 1016654
|
139,646 | 2025 |
4.1
|
A |
| 137 |
MSC VIVIANA
IMO 9777216
|
17,273 TEU | 2017 |
4.1
|
A |
| 135 |
MAERSK CAMDEN
IMO 9924194
|
15,500 TEU | 2022 |
4.1
|
A |
| 138 |
MSC VICTORINE
IMO 9946867
|
16,000 TEU | 2023 |
4.1
|
A |
| 141 |
ALBERT MAERSK
IMO 9961805
|
14,942 TEU | 2025 |
4.1
|
A |
| 140 |
MSC FREYA
IMO 9932062
|
15,264 TEU | 2023 |
4.1
|
A |
| 139 |
MSC IDANIA
IMO 9962562
|
202,562 | 2024 |
4.1
|
A |
| 142 |
CMA CGM GALAPAGOS
IMO 9894997
|
15,000 TEU | 2022 |
4.1
|
A |
| 143 |
CMA CGM TENERE
IMO 9859117
|
15,128 TEU | 2020 |
4.1
|
A |
| 144 |
CMA CGM GRACE BAY
IMO 9938145
|
15,000 TEU | 2024 |
4.1
|
A |
| 149 |
ONE TREASURE
IMO 9773222
|
20,150 TEU | 2018 |
4.2
|
A |
| 148 |
MSC MARIELLA
IMO 9934747
|
24,000 TEU | 2023 |
4.2
|
A |
| 147 |
CMA CGM MONTMARTRE
IMO 9839155
|
23,500 TEU | 2021 |
4.2
|
A |
| 146 |
CMA CGM BIG SUR
IMO 9938169
|
15,000 TEU | 2024 |
4.2
|
A |
| 145 |
MANILA EXPRESS
IMO 9540120
|
23,660 TEU | 2023 |
4.2
|
A |
| 150 |
OOCL TURKIYE
IMO 9908138
|
23,000 TEU | 2023 |
4.2
|
A |
Which engines power the greenest fleets?
The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.
AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.