Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#855 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
13.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
+27% higher
D

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,033B 687C 506D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 274 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 761 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 761 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 658 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
851 UAL COLOGNE
IMO 9681534
8,736 2014
13.8
D
852 MONTSERRAT
IMO 9213739
9,567 2000
13.8
D
853 MARTINA
IMO 9594286
8,564 2012
13.8
D
854 FRANBO PROSPECT
IMO 9512692
11,008 2010
13.8
D
855 AL UDEID
IMO 9294965
10,508 2004
13.8
D
856 ADRIATICBORG
IMO 9546497
17,294 2011
13.8
D
857 VLISTBORG
IMO 9160346
9,567 1999
13.8
D
858 SOFIA
IMO 9957414
7,896 2024
13.8
D
859 HAPPY DOVER
IMO 9551959
18,074 2011
13.9
D
860 BORE WIND
IMO 9892901
6,792 2022
13.9
D
861 HC MELINA
IMO 9415052
9,198 2011
13.9
D
862 OLIVIA
IMO 9957402
7,896 2024
13.9
D
863 BEAUTRANGA
IMO 9532812
8,250 2011
13.9
D
864 UAL BODEWES
IMO 9542336
8,327 2012
13.9
D
865 MINERVAGRACHT
IMO 9571521
12,176 2011
14.0
D
866 SCHIPPERSGRACHT
IMO 9197363
21,402 2000
14.0
D
867 ONEGO NEVA
IMO 9438585
11,087 2008
14.0
D
868 YM FUJI
IMO 9622760
10,952 2015
14.0
D
869 INDUSTRIAL SKIPPER
IMO 9741138
12,329 2016
14.0
D
870 LONGWOLF
IMO 9504126
11,023 2010
14.0
D
871 JAEGER ARROW
IMO 9215347
23,529 2001
14.0
D
872 SOPHIA
IMO 9467017
12,590 2011
14.0
D
873 LADY VIVIANA
IMO 9320518
11,551 2005
14.0
D
874 TANJA
IMO 9534444
10,049 2011
14.1
D
875 ANNAMARIA
IMO 9488633
8,091 2008
14.1
D
876 VOORNEBORG
IMO 9179373
9,567 1999
14.1
D
877 ARNEBORG
IMO 9333539
17,356 2006
14.1
D
878 KONINGSBORG
IMO 9155925
9,067 1998
14.1
D
879 WOLF
IMO 9306407
7,609 2006
14.1
D
880 IJBORG
IMO 9456721
12,007 2009
14.1
D
881 DELTAGRACHT
IMO 9420801
18,143 2009
14.1
D
882 AMISOS
IMO 9584994
8,716 2011
14.1
D
883 FLAMURI
IMO 9472713
8,500 2008
14.1
D
884 HAMBURG.HS
IMO 9168403
8,889 1997
14.1
D
885 INDUSTRIAL SONG
IMO 9750464
12,292 2017
14.2
D
886 SABAHAT SONAY
IMO 9370525
14,888 2007
14.2
D
887 HEEMSKERKGRACHT
IMO 9443669
12,672 2009
14.2
D
888 KAREWOOD PRIDE
IMO 9281499
6,315 2006
14.2
D
889 LADY JASMIN
IMO 9106974
11,307 1994
14.2
D
890 STADIONGRACHT
IMO 9202508
21,449 2000
14.3
D
891 BBC MARYLAND
IMO 9433298
12,720 2010
14.3
D
892 DEBBIE
IMO 9488061
12,731 2011
14.3
D
893 VERTOM JOY
IMO 9706865
11,000 2023
14.3
D
894 SCHELDEGRACHT
IMO 9202510
21,446 2000
14.3
D
895 ONEGO BAYOU
IMO 9369069
11,087 2007
14.3
D
896 TRITO NAVIGATOR
IMO 9631357
8,137 2013
14.3
D
897 MISSISSIPPIBORG
IMO 9207508
9,732 2000
14.3
D
898 BANDURA
IMO 9526071
8,217 2010
14.3
D
899 FATIH
IMO 9381421
8,591 2009
14.4
D
900 LADY DEBORA
IMO 9147875
7,580 1998
14.4
D
Page 18 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.