Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#875 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
7.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-28% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
851 MAERSK MONTE ALTO
IMO 9283227
4,000 TEU 2005
7.0
B
850 MSC BRITTANY
IMO 9724049
9,162 TEU 2016
7.0
B
853 OOCL LUXEMBOURG
IMO 9417270
8,063 TEU 2006
7.0
B
856 AL SAFAT
IMO 9349497
6,435 TEU 2008
7.0
B
855 EVER LENIENT
IMO 9604146
8,452 TEU 2014
7.0
B
854 KOTA KAMIL
IMO 9307413
3,081 TEU 2006
7.0
B
857 CHENNAI EXPRESS
IMO 9306158
6,539 TEU 2006
7.0
B
858 MSC MAEVA
IMO 9289128
8,089 TEU 2005
7.0
B
860 MAERSK MAKUTU
IMO 9318319
4,154 TEU 2007
7.0
B
859 MSC VEGA
IMO 9465265
13,102 TEU 2012
7.0
B
861 MAERSK NAKURU
IMO 9356103
2,478 TEU 2008
7.1
B
862 PANDA 006
IMO 9677026
6,900 TEU 2012
7.1
B
864 ONE TRITON
IMO 9356713
6,661 TEU 2008
7.1
B
863 AL MANAMAH
IMO 9349538
6,435 TEU 2008
7.1
B
865 NHAVA SHEVA EXPRESS
IMO 9406738
9,954 TEU 2011
7.1
B
866 NYK VESTA
IMO 9312808
9,012 TEU 2007
7.1
B
867 MAERSK STADELHORN
IMO 9726671
10,000 TEU 2013
7.1
C
868 MSC SANDRA
IMO 9203954
4,315 TEU 2000
7.1
C
869 MSC PALAK
IMO 9735206
9,408 TEU 2016
7.1
C
870 MSC AJACCIO
IMO 9605267
9,403 TEU 2014
7.1
C
874 HAIPHONG EXPRESS
IMO 9778129
10,100 TEU 2018
7.1
C
873 MSC MUNDRA VIII
IMO 9294989
8,814 TEU 2005
7.1
C
872 MUNDRA EXPRESS
IMO 9408865
9,954 TEU 2011
7.1
C
871 MSC TIANPING
IMO 9305489
8,533 TEU 2006
7.1
C
875 MEDITERRANEAN EXPRESS
IMO 9622019
4,800 TEU 2014
7.1
C
876 JOLLY BIANCO
IMO 9320427
6,336 TEU 2006
7.1
C
878 OOCL EUROPE
IMO 9300805
8,063 TEU 2004
7.1
C
877 JOLLY VERDE
IMO 9320441
6,336 TEU 2007
7.1
C
880 MSC AMALFI
IMO 9605279
9,403 TEU 2014
7.1
C
879 MED BEYKOZ
IMO 9064748
2,480 TEU 1994
7.1
C
881 MSC SHANNON III
IMO 8913423
3,005 TEU 1991
7.2
C
882 MAERSK PANGANI
IMO 9786097
5,300 TEU 2021
7.2
C
884 MSC BUSAN
IMO 9289087
8,089 TEU 2005
7.2
C
883 CMA CGM JEAN GABRIEL
IMO 9729128
10,926 TEU 2018
7.2
C
885 MSC RANIA VIII
IMO 9309447
8,401 TEU 2005
7.2
C
886 ONE HENRY HUDSON
IMO 9302176
8,212 TEU 2008
7.2
C
889 MSC DARIEN
IMO 9243394
8,384 TEU 2003
7.2
C
888 NYK VIRGO
IMO 9312810
9,012 TEU 2007
7.2
C
887 BRIGHTON
IMO 9332846
6,350 TEU 2008
7.2
C
890 CATHERINE C
IMO 9969998
7,200 TEU 2024
7.2
C
892 COSCO ANTWERP
IMO 9246396
5,618 TEU 2001
7.2
C
891 MSC ANZU
IMO 9710426
8,800 TEU 2015
7.2
C
894 AGIOS DIMITRIOS
IMO 9349605
6,572 TEU 2011
7.2
C
893 ARGUS
IMO 9262716
6,492 TEU 2004
7.2
C
895 MERKUR OCEAN
IMO 9620619
3,868 TEU 2013
7.2
C
898 MSC ANCHORAGE
IMO 9619440
8,762 TEU 2013
7.2
C
897 MSC ROMANE
IMO 9745653
9,408 TEU 2017
7.2
C
896 ONE HANNOVER
IMO 9302138
8,212 TEU 2006
7.2
C
900 ONE OLYMPUS
IMO 9312987
8,628 TEU 2008
7.2
C
899 MSC PAMELA
IMO 9290531
9,178 TEU 2005
7.2
C
Page 18 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.