Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#943 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
7.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-24% greener
C
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
901 MSC LAURA
IMO 9225665
6,750 TEU 2002
7.7
C
902 GSL CHATEAU D'IF
IMO 9335202
5,089 TEU 2007
7.7
C
904 NYK REMUS
IMO 9416965
4,888 TEU 2009
7.7
C
903 ZIM PELICAN
IMO 9960526
5,300 TEU 2024
7.7
C
908 MSC NAHARA
IMO 9955789
1,800 TEU 2024
7.7
C
907 CMA CGM ESTELLE
IMO 9729116
9,400 TEU 2018
7.7
C
906 CMA CGM ROSSINI
IMO 9280639
5,782 TEU 2004
7.7
C
905 CMA CGM TIVOLI
IMO 9961312
2,000 TEU 2024
7.7
C
909 MAERSK PITTSBURGH
IMO 9342176
6,200 TEU 2008
7.7
C
911 MAERSK KARACHI
IMO 9162215
6,690 TEU 1998
7.8
C
910 CMA CGM CONGO
IMO 9679892
9,220 TEU 2015
7.8
C
912 EXPRESS BRAZIL
IMO 9443023
3,459 TEU 2010
7.8
C
913 PANDA 007
IMO 9280598
5,762 TEU 2004
7.8
C
914 CONTI COURAGE
IMO 9293789
8,084 TEU 2005
7.8
C
915 MSC RUBY
IMO 9502960
13,092 TEU 2013
7.8
C
917 CMA CGM MOZART
IMO 9280615
5,762 TEU 2004
7.8
C
916 MSC DAISY
IMO 9295165
4,900 TEU 2005
7.8
C
918 ONE HANNOVER
IMO 9302138
8,212 TEU 2006
7.8
C
919 MSC JOY
IMO 9039250
1,933 TEU 1992
7.8
C
920 CMA CGM MERMAID
IMO 9961283
2,000 TEU 2024
7.8
C
921 MSC DORINE
IMO 9301328
5,060 TEU 2005
7.8
C
922 ONE MARVEL
IMO 9475612
6,724 TEU 2010
7.8
C
924 MSC KRITTIKA
IMO 9051507
2,394 TEU 1994
7.8
C
923 MSC ATHOS
IMO 9618317
8,800 TEU 2013
7.8
C
925 CMA CGM CARL ANTOINE
IMO 9729087
9,400 TEU 2017
7.8
C
927 ZIM CHINA
IMO 9389382
4,275 TEU 2008
7.8
C
926 MAERSK LOTA
IMO 9526954
8,700 TEU 2012
7.8
C
929 MAERSK GATESHEAD
IMO 9235543
4,318 TEU 2002
7.8
C
928 CMA CGM ALTAMIRA
IMO 9961350
2,000 TEU 2024
7.8
C
931 NILEDUTCH LION
IMO 9337456
8,241 TEU 2008
7.8
C
930 FOS EXPRESS
IMO 9348699
5,100 TEU 2008
7.8
C
932 MSC FABIENNE
IMO 9279965
4,862 TEU 2004
7.9
C
933 HYUNDAI SHANGHAI
IMO 9305647
6,800 TEU 2006
7.9
C
934 CMA CGM JACQUES JOSEPH
IMO 9729104
9,400 TEU 2017
7.9
C
935 ATLANTICA POWER
IMO 9467055
4,600 TEU 2010
7.9
C
937 MSC ATHENS
IMO 9618305
8,800 TEU 2013
7.9
C
936 CMA CGM PUERTO ANTIOQUIA
IMO 9275050
2,556 TEU 2004
7.9
C
939 ONE HARBOUR
IMO 9302152
8,212 TEU 2007
7.9
C
938 SANTA CRUZ
IMO 9444742
7,090 TEU 2011
7.9
C
940 MSC ARCHIMIDIS
IMO 9315379
7,943 TEU 2006
7.9
C
941 MSC JERSEY
IMO 9622007
4,800 TEU 2014
7.9
C
942 MAERSK STRALSUND
IMO 9303522
8,400 TEU 2005
7.9
C
944 VILNIA MAERSK
IMO 9778533
3,700 TEU 2019
7.9
C
943 CMA CGM CHOPIN
IMO 9280603
5,762 TEU 2004
7.9
C
949 NYK RIGEL
IMO 9416977
4,888 TEU 2009
7.9
C
948 ONE HUMBER
IMO 9302140
8,212 TEU 2006
7.9
C
947 MSC ROSARIA
IMO 9320453
4,860 TEU 2007
7.9
C
946 SEASPAN OCEANIA
IMO 9286009
8,468 TEU 2004
7.9
C
945 HYUNDAI PRESTIGE
IMO 9625528
5,023 TEU 2013
7.9
C
950 MSC MARTA
IMO 9295385
5,599 TEU 2005
7.9
C
Page 19 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.