Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,055 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
8.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-18% greener
C
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1051 SANTA VIOLA
IMO 9295373
5,599 TEU 2005
8.5
C
1052 MED BEYKOZ
IMO 9064748
2,480 TEU 1994
8.5
C
1053 KINGSTON
IMO 9389693
4,250 TEU 2008
8.5
C
1054 SEASPAN SAIGON
IMO 9301809
4,253 TEU 2006
8.5
C
1055 MOL PROFICIENCY
IMO 9403619
6,350 TEU 2007
8.5
C
1056 MAERSK DURBAN
IMO 9299044
2,478 TEU 2005
8.5
C
1057 MAERSK KANSAS
IMO 9311701
4,154 TEU 2007
8.5
C
1058 LIVORNO EXPRESS
IMO 9610157
3,800 TEU 2014
8.5
C
1059 MSC UNITED VIII
IMO 9302619
8,200 TEU 2006
8.5
C
1060 MSC HANNAH
IMO 9316347
2,732 TEU 2006
8.5
C
1061 MAERSK ATLANTA
IMO 9348649
6,400 TEU 2006
8.5
C
1062 MAERSK NORFOLK
IMO 9356139
2,478 TEU 2008
8.5
C
1063 MSC AMALFI
IMO 9605279
9,400 TEU 2014
8.5
C
1064 DETROIT EXPRESS
IMO 9610169
3,800 TEU 2014
8.5
C
1065 CAPE SPENCER
IMO 9950129
2,713 TEU 2023
8.5
C
1066 MAERSK NARMADA
IMO 9356098
2,478 TEU 2008
8.6
C
1067 MSC CATHERINE VI
IMO 9229300
6,200 TEU 2001
8.6
C
1068 GSL ELENI
IMO 9285677
7,455 TEU 2004
8.6
C
1069 MSC ATLANTIC III
IMO 8913447
2,668 TEU 1991
8.6
C
1070 ITAL BONUS
IMO 9786994
2,800 TEU 2018
8.6
C
1071 MAERSK NOKWANDA
IMO 9294393
4,045 TEU 2005
8.6
C
1072 MSC GUERNSEY
IMO 9631876
4,699 TEU 2015
8.6
C
1073 MSC MADRID
IMO 9480198
5,550 TEU 2011
8.6
C
1074 MAERSK IDAHO
IMO 9193264
4,338 TEU 2000
8.6
C
1075 VAYENGA MAERSK
IMO 9775751
3,600 TEU 2018
8.6
C
1076 MSC RONIT R
IMO 9293167
4,922 TEU 2005
8.6
C
1077 MSC POLARIS
IMO 9074042
4,743 TEU 1995
8.6
C
1078 CMA CGM TOPAZ
IMO 9397602
4,300 TEU 2009
8.6
C
1079 MAERSK UTAH
IMO 9305300
4,154 TEU 2006
8.6
C
1080 NINGBO
IMO 9398400
7,500 TEU 2009
8.6
C
1081 MSC NORA III
IMO 9327671
2,732 TEU 2006
8.6
C
1082 MSC AGADIR
IMO 9619464
8,762 TEU 2012
8.6
C
1083 HMM BANGKOK
IMO 9323510
6,763 TEU 2007
8.6
C
1084 MED MERSIN
IMO 9135638
2,908 TEU 1996
8.6
C
1085 NYK CONSTELLATION
IMO 9337626
4,888 TEU 2007
8.6
C
1086 MAERSK BROWNSVILLE
IMO 9313955
4,196 TEU 2007
8.6
C
1087 MAERSK IOWA
IMO 9298686
4,154 TEU 2006
8.6
C
1088 CMA CGM BARRACUDA
IMO 9322475
5,090 TEU 2007
8.7
C
1089 CMA CGM RODOLPHE
IMO 9729075
9,400 TEU 2017
8.7
C
1090 MSC MONTEREY V
IMO 9349796
4,860 TEU 2007
8.7
C
1091 HMM OAKLAND
IMO 9385013
6,350 TEU 2009
8.7
C
1092 MAERSK BAHAMAS
IMO 9697026
2,500 TEU 2016
8.7
C
1093 CMA CGM FRANCOISE SAGAN
IMO 9356696
6,661 TEU 2008
8.7
C
1094 HYUNDAI SINGAPORE
IMO 9305685
6,763 TEU 2006
8.7
C
1095 MSC NEW HAVEN
IMO 9293777
8,084 TEU 2005
8.7
C
1096 KASSIAKOS
IMO 9386471
4,360 TEU 2009
8.7
C
1097 GLEN CANYON
IMO 9302097
5,642 TEU 2006
8.7
C
1098 MSC MARGARITA
IMO 9238741
5,514 TEU 2002
8.7
C
1099 CAPE MOSS
IMO 9445916
2,758 TEU 2011
8.8
C
1100 LUNA MAERSK
IMO 9190781
4,045 TEU 2002
8.8
C
Page 22 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.