Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,223 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
8.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-11% greener
C
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1201 LANGENESS
IMO 9944778
1,800 TEU 2023
8.7
C
1202 CMA CGM MENDELSSOHN
IMO 9449106
3,646 TEU 2012
8.7
C
1203 CMA CGM SEMARANG
IMO 9377133
2,700 TEU 2007
8.7
C
1204 MAERSK BENGUELA
IMO 9355367
3,078 TEU 2005
8.8
C
1205 MSC GRETA III
IMO 9415296
2,732 TEU 2008
8.8
C
1206 PANDA 008
IMO 9248162
5,752 TEU 2003
8.8
C
1207 MSC LIPSIA III
IMO 9237498
3,091 TEU 2004
8.8
C
1208 LUNA MAERSK
IMO 9190781
4,045 TEU 2002
8.8
C
1209 MSC FOLEGANDROS VI
IMO 9247560
5,576 TEU 2001
8.8
C
1210 VOLGA MAERSK
IMO 9775749
3,600 TEU 2018
8.8
C
1211 MSC INDIA
IMO 9231248
5,762 TEU 2002
8.8
C
1212 LAUST MAERSK
IMO 9190743
4,045 TEU 2001
8.8
C
1213 MAERSK NOMAZWE
IMO 9294381
4,045 TEU 2004
8.8
C
1214 NYK METEOR
IMO 9337638
4,888 TEU 2007
8.8
C
1215 MSC LEIGH
IMO 9320439
4,860 TEU 2006
8.8
C
1216 MSC SENA
IMO 9116369
2,517 TEU 1996
8.8
C
1217 LITTLE ATHINA
IMO 9980368
24,500 2024
8.8
C
1218 GARDINER
IMO 9275048
2,556 TEU 2003
8.8
C
1219 MSC ANTONIA
IMO 9398216
6,500 TEU 2009
8.8
C
1220 MSC NEDERLAND III
IMO 8918954
2,668 TEU 1992
8.8
C
1221 MSC DONATA
IMO 9237151
3,900 TEU 2002
8.8
C
1222 MSC RONIT R
IMO 9293167
4,922 TEU 2005
8.8
C
1223 MAERSK DURBAN
IMO 9299044
2,478 TEU 2005
8.8
C
1224 MSC NURIA
IMO 9349825
4,860 TEU 2008
8.8
C
1225 CHIQUITA HARVESTER
IMO 9976226
23,900 2024
8.8
C
1226 NYK NEBULA
IMO 9337640
4,888 TEU 2007
8.8
C
1227 MAERSK GIRONDE
IMO 9235555
4,318 TEU 2002
8.9
C
1228 MAERSK GARONNE
IMO 9235579
4,318 TEU 2003
8.9
C
1229 IONIKOS
IMO 9397614
4,308 TEU 2009
8.9
C
1230 BROOKLYN BRIDGE
IMO 9458999
4,432 TEU 2010
8.9
C
1231 LEONIDAS Z
IMO 9963528
2,782 TEU 2024
8.9
C
1232 MSC ROWAN
IMO 9477610
4,250 TEU 2012
8.9
C
1233 CMA CGM EIFFEL
IMO 9248112
4,367 TEU 2002
8.9
C
1234 BAMSI BEYREK
IMO 9215919
2,556 TEU 2001
8.9
C
1235 MSC MASHA 3
IMO 9188219
2,169 TEU 1998
8.9
C
1236 MEHMET KAHVECI A
IMO 9248916
1,150 TEU 2002
8.9
C
1237 VAYENGA MAERSK
IMO 9775751
3,600 TEU 2018
8.9
C
1238 CMA CGM PUGET
IMO 9248124
4,367 TEU 2002
8.9
C
1239 CMA CGM SYDNEY
IMO 9315953
4,300 TEU 2007
8.9
C
1240 ADAMS
IMO 9260914
5,928 TEU 2003
8.9
C
1241 MSC HARMONY III
IMO 9309411
2,824 TEU 2006
8.9
C
1242 MAERSK VALLETTA
IMO 9833369
1,800 TEU 2019
8.9
C
1243 DETROIT EXPRESS
IMO 9610169
3,800 TEU 2014
8.9
C
1244 MAERSK KANSAS
IMO 9311701
4,154 TEU 2007
8.9
C
1245 VISTULA MAERSK
IMO 9775737
3,600 TEU 2018
8.9
C
1246 GSL TEGEA
IMO 9222986
5,514 TEU 2001
8.9
C
1247 MSC MIRELLA R
IMO 9293179
4,922 TEU 2005
8.9
C
1248 MAERSK BAYETE
IMO 9355355
3,078 TEU 2009
8.9
C
1249 KALAHARI EXPRESS
IMO 9400095
6,300 TEU 2010
8.9
C
1250 MSC MARTA
IMO 9295385
5,599 TEU 2005
9.0
C
Page 25 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.