Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

LNG Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#304 of 317 lng carriers
CO₂ intensity
17.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (8.12)
+111% higher
E

CII band distribution

72 at D/E
A 203B 115C 58D 30E 42

448 rated vessels · 38 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

10
Q3
11
Q4
4
'27 Q1
5
'27 Q2
7
'27 Q3
2
'27 Q4
5
'28 Q1
6
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 374 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 156 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 75 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Exhaust waste heat recovery 73 3–8% €800–2,000/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

45
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€18–54M
capex range, top measure per vessel (45 of 45 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
EXCELSIOR · 60-100k E 21y 2026
GAS AGILITY · <25k E 6y 2026
GREEN ZEEBRUGGE · <25k E 9y 2026
GAS POLARIS · 60-100k E 24y 2026
ENERGOS POWER · 60-100k E 5y 2026
See all 448 rated lng carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
324
vessels ranked
0.87
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
6.61
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
301 ARCTIC VOYAGER
IMO 9275335
75,434 2006
16.2
E
302 CASTILLO DE VILLALBA
IMO 9236418
77,217 2003
16.5
E
303 SEAPEAK CATALUNYA
IMO 9236420
77,204 2003
17.1
E
304 LNG SOKOTO
IMO 9216303
79,822 2002
17.9
E
305 RAVENNA KNUTSEN
IMO 9874040
18,277 2021
18.3
E
306 ENERGY SPIRIT
IMO 9269207
36,952 2006
22.2
E
307 DAPENG PRINCESS
IMO 9937907
45,462 2023
22.9
E
308 K. LOTUS
IMO 9901362
12,351 2022
23.5
E
309 CORAL FRASERI
IMO 9378278
10,441 2010
27.2
E
310 CORAL FUNGIA
IMO 9378292
9,999 2011
27.8
E
311 CORAL FAVIA
IMO 9378280
10,441 2010
27.9
E
312 CORAL FURCATA
IMO 9378307
10,441 2011
28.0
E
313 CORAL METHANE
IMO 9404584
5,953 2009
33.3
E
314 LEVANTE LNG
IMO 9942524
9,173 2023
34.5
E
315 SEAPEAK HISPANIA
IMO 9230048
79,363 2002
36.2
E
316 AVENIR ASCENSION
IMO 9868974
4,716 2022
43.1
E
317 NEW FRONTIER 1
IMO 9765079
5,320 2017
43.5
E
Page 7 of 7 — 317 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.